From Solution to Executable Plan
CreatePlan takes a solution design (or any "plan ask") and transforms it into an actionable project plan through multi-AI collaboration with explicit agent assignments.
Three AI perspectives (Claude, Gemini, Codex) independently create implementation plans, which are synthesized and peer-reviewed. The final plan specifies which agent handles each task and which tasks can run in parallel.
Result: A comprehensive project plan with clear agent assignments (PM, Architect, Security, Developer, QA) and parallel execution guidance for maximum efficiency.
Agent Assignments
Every task in the final plan specifies which agent should execute it. The available agents are:
PM
Project orchestration, multi-agent coordination, milestone tracking
Architect
System design, tech decisions, ADRs, integration patterns
Security
Network, auth, DNS, secrets, Keycloak, Traefik, SSL/TLS
Developer
Implementation, Docker deployment, debugging, database ops
QA
Test creation, GitLab CI pipelines, quality gates, validation
Parallel Execution
The final plan identifies which tasks can run simultaneously using parallel group notation:
Parallel Group Notation
Tasks with the same group letter (A, B, C...) can execute simultaneously. Multiple developers can work on independent services at the same time.
Example: Phased Execution with Parallel Groups
Parallel Execution Rules
Independent Tasks
Tasks with no shared dependencies can run in parallel (same group letter).
Same Agent Type
Multiple developers can work simultaneously on different services (Dev-1, Dev-2).
Cross-Agent Parallel
Architect can plan Phase 2 while Developers implement Phase 1.
The CreatePlan Workflow
End-to-End Process Flow
All 3 Plans] C2 --> D C3 --> D D --> E[Draft Plan
+ Agent Assignments
+ Parallel Groups] end subgraph REVIEW["4. Peer Review"] E --> F1[Gemini Review] E --> F2[Codex Review] F1 --> G[Incorporate Feedback] F2 --> G end subgraph OUTPUT["5. Output"] G --> H[Final Plan
w/ Agents & Parallel] H --> I[Executive Presentation] end style INPUT fill:#f0fdfa,stroke:#14b8a6 style PARALLEL fill:#faf5ff,stroke:#a855f7 style SYNTHESIS fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#f59e0b style REVIEW fill:#eff6ff,stroke:#3b82f6 style OUTPUT fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#22c55e
Three AI Perspectives
Each AI brings different training backgrounds and reasoning patterns to the planning process:
Claude
Practical Execution & Integration
Deep architectural analysis, nuanced technical decisions, and integration considerations.
Gemini
High-Level Architecture & User Workflows
System integration, user flow design, and best practices research with web search.
Codex
Technical Implementation & Feasibility
Code structure, technical stack choices, implementation order, and potential blockers.
Step-by-Step Process
Clarify & Format
Minimal clarification of the plan ask to ensure all AI reviewers interpret requirements consistently.
Parallel Plan Generation PARALLEL
All three AIs independently create implementation plans from the same input simultaneously.
Plan Synthesis
Claude analyzes all three plans, assigns agents to tasks, identifies parallel opportunities, creates unified draft.
Peer Review PARALLEL
Gemini and Codex review the draft plan, providing feedback on completeness, feasibility, and agent assignments.
Final Plan
Incorporate peer review feedback, finalize agent assignments and parallel groups.
Executive Presentation
Create a web-ready visual summary with timeline diagrams, agent workload, and parallel execution visualization.
Final Plan Structure
The final plan includes these required sections:
Executive Summary
2-3 paragraph overview of the project scope and approach.
Phase Breakdown
Tasks organized by execution order with clear milestones.
Task Details
Each task with agent assignment, parallel group, dependencies, and deliverable.
Dependency Graph
Visual Mermaid diagram showing task dependencies and parallel groups.
Agent Workload Summary
Tasks per agent, parallel opportunities, and workload distribution.
Risk Register
Potential blockers and mitigation strategies from multi-AI analysis.
Dependency Graph Example
Architect] --> B[User Service
Developer-1] A --> C[Product Service
Developer-2] A --> D[Test Specs
QA] B --> E[Integration
Developer] C --> E D --> F[CI Pipeline
QA] E --> F F --> G[Security Audit
Security] subgraph "Parallel Group A" B C D end subgraph "Parallel Group B" F G end
CreateSolution vs CreatePlan
These two skills work together in sequence:
CreateSolution
- Answers: "What should we build?"
- Focuses on requirements and design
- Proposes architecture and approach
- Defines technology choices
- Creates solution design document
CreatePlan
- Answers: "How do we build it?"
- Assigns agents to each task
- Identifies parallel execution opportunities
- Defines phases and dependencies
- Creates actionable project plan
Shape requirements using /feature-forge, /spec-miner, or Spec Review (Open WebUI)
The Power of Multi-AI Planning with Agents
Different AI models see different risks, consider different edge cases, and prioritize different concerns.
By synthesizing three independent plans, assigning specialized agents, and identifying parallel execution paths, CreatePlan produces executable project plans that maximize team efficiency.
Output File Structure
All artifacts are saved to a consistent directory structure:
How to Use
Invoke the Skill
/createplan [your plan ask here]
Example:
/createplan Implement the options finder API as specified in the solution document
The skill will automatically:
- Create a descriptor based on your input
- Generate plans from all three AI nodes (in parallel)
- Synthesize with agent assignments and parallel groups
- Peer-review the draft (Gemini + Codex in parallel)
- Deploy an executive presentation to nginx
Why This Approach Works
Clear Ownership
Every task has an assigned agent, eliminating ambiguity about who does what.
Maximum Parallelism
Independent tasks are explicitly grouped for simultaneous execution.
Diverse Perspectives
Three AI models catch blind spots that any single model would miss.
Executable Output
Plans can be directly executed using Claude Code's Task() for spawning agents.
Risk Mitigation
Peer review catches feasibility issues before implementation begins.
Executive Visibility
Web presentation provides stakeholders with clear timeline and workload visibility.